Support adaptive tasklist partitioner in matching simulations #6550
+158
−42
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
taylanisikdemir
requested review from
Shaddoll,
neil-xie,
davidporter-id-au,
shijiesheng,
sankari165 and
dkrotx
as code owners
Shaddoll
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
Adding support for adaptive tasklist partitioner in matching simulations
Why?
Test and validate the behavior in local simulations.
How did you test it?
Above command runs following scenarios
Checked CSV Output. It shows that adaptive partitioner scaled up to 2 partitions and have much better task latencies compared to fixed 4 partitions.
I will be adding support for visualizing metrics in a follow up PR to help us get more insights on what is happening during simulation.