Added DotCover Cover command

[bjorkstromm]

Added DotCover Cover command. Needed since TeamCity only want snapshots, not HTML/XML reports.

If possible, to remove duplicate code, I would like to reuse DotCoverCoverSettings in DotCoverAnalyser by having DotCoverAnalyseSettings to inherit from DotCoverCoverSettings. Is this allowed since it will make documentation unclear?

NOTE: Quickly hacked using my Linux box, need to verify functionality on Windows (dotCover.exe doesn't run under Mono). But this have to wait until monday when I'm back at work.

//cc @patriksvensson

[patriksvensson]

@mholo65 Nice! 👍

Funny, but as you published this PR I was updating the site to show inherited members better (cake-build/website#65) 😄 As soon as that PR is merged, this won't be a problem anymore. As long as it's not a breaking change, the refactoring is OK with me.

I would however recommending adding an abstract DotCoverSettings for settings shared between different (related) DotCover tools and add all shared functionality there.

Great job!

[bjorkstromm]

Nice! Shouldn't be a breaking change, Analyse uses all settings as Coverer plus ReportType.

[bjorkstromm]

@patriksvensson, refactored, rebased and done.

An additional suggestion for removing duplicate code.

• Create an abstract class for handling DotCoverSettings argument creation and interception of the unit test runner process.

DotCoverWhateverName<TSettings> : DotCoverTool<TSettings> where TSettings : DotCoverSettings

• Or an internal extension method (GetArguments) for DotCoverSettings and move InterceptAction to DotCoverTool

internal static ProcessArgumentBuilder GetArguments(this DotCoverSettings settings, ProcessArgumentBuilder builder)

What do you think? Or should we leave it as is.

[patriksvensson]

@mholo65 Sorry for not getting back sooner about this.
This PR looks good to me 👍

I think it's better to do more refactoring in a separate PR. It makes it easier to see how things are affected.

@devlead and @gep13: Any comments on this PR before merging?

[devlead]

Trim trailing white space here.

[devlead]

@patriksvensson looks good to me, just left one minor comment, remove WIP and rebase, also do we have an referring issue to the PR assigned to a release?

[patriksvensson]

@devlead Doh! Assumed there was an issue for this.

@mholo65 Can you create an issue for this?

[patriksvensson]

@mholo65 Perfect, thanks!

[bjorkstromm]

Trimmed, rebased and done.

@devlead You probably meant the trailing whitespace in DotCoverSettings.cs:35 not DotCoverAnalyseSettings.cs:35 since You are referring to an deletion in your comment.

[bjorkstromm]

HOLD!. sorry, forgot to rebase :)

[bjorkstromm]

Rebased and checks have passed.

[patriksvensson]

Merged! Thank you for this! 👍