-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to skip pushing duplicate nuget packages #775
Comments
AdmiringWorm
added a commit
to AdmiringWorm/Cake.Recipe
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2021
…ring push This allows duplicate NuGet packages to not throw any errors when there is a duplicate package version in the upstream repository, and instead allow the build to continue without any failures
gep13
pushed a commit
to AdmiringWorm/Cake.Recipe
that referenced
this issue
Feb 23, 2021
…ring push This allows duplicate NuGet packages to not throw any errors when there is a duplicate package version in the upstream repository, and instead allow the build to continue without any failures
gep13
pushed a commit
to AdmiringWorm/Cake.Recipe
that referenced
this issue
Feb 23, 2021
…ring push This allows duplicate NuGet packages to not throw any errors when there is a duplicate package version in the upstream repository, and instead allow the build to continue without any failures
gep13
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 23, 2021
(GH-775) Add ability to skip duplicate package version during push
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 3.0.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your GitReleaseManager bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When trying to push a NuGet package, the method and the binary file have an option called
SkipDuplicate
that allows users to make sure that duplicates packages won't fail the build even if the package already exists.This is something that would be nice to allow to be set, either by default or through an argument when calling
ToolSettings
that users can enable.This is also something that should be easy to implement and something I can look at implementing, but opening this issue as a buy in before any kind of implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: