Chore: setup Nevada County Connects in test

[lalver1]

Part of #2434

This PR adds the logo and templates required to set up a new transit agency. These are, for the transit agency

• Nevada County (NevCo) Connects logo (small and large)
• index template
• eligibility index template

and for the enrollment flows

• enrollment success template

Setting up the database in test is being tracked in the issue.

To test

To test logos, core/index--nevco.html, and eligibility/index--nevco.html, add these fixtures (NevCo transit agency and an older adult flow) to your local fixtures (ideally the repo's local_fixtures.json so the primary keys of these fixtures don't conflict with your local ones) and reset your database to load them:

{
        "model": "core.transitagency",
        "pk": 2,
        "fields": {
            "active": true,
            "slug": "nevco",
            "short_name": "NevCo (test)",
            "long_name": "Nevada County Connects (test)",
            "info_url": "https://www.nevadacountyca.gov/3456/Transit-Services",
            "phone": "530-477-0103",
            "index_template": "core/index--nevco.html",
            "eligibility_index_template": "eligibility/index--nevco.html",
            "eligibility_api_id": "eligibility-api-id",
            "eligibility_api_private_key": 2,
            "eligibility_api_public_key": 3,
            "eligibility_api_jws_signing_alg": "RS256",
            "transit_processor": 1,
            "transit_processor_audience": "audience",
            "transit_processor_client_id": "client-id",
            "transit_processor_client_secret_name": "client-secret-name",
            "staff_group": null,
            "sso_domain": "",
            "customer_service_group": null
        }
    },
{
        "model": "core.enrollmentflow",
        "pk": 6,
        "fields": {
            "system_name": "senior",
            "display_order": 5,
            "claims_provider": 1,
            "claims_scope": "verify:senior",
            "claims_claim": "senior",
            "claims_scheme_override": "",
            "eligibility_api_url": "",
            "eligibility_api_auth_header": "",
            "eligibility_api_auth_key_secret_name": null,
            "eligibility_api_public_key": null,
            "eligibility_api_jwe_cek_enc": "",
            "eligibility_api_jwe_encryption_alg": "",
            "eligibility_api_jws_signing_alg": "",
            "selection_label_template": "eligibility/includes/selection-label--senior.html",
            "eligibility_start_template": "eligibility/start--senior.html",
            "eligibility_form_class": "",
            "eligibility_unverified_template": "eligibility/unverified.html",
            "help_template": "",
            "label": "Older Adult",
            "group_id": "group123",
            "supports_expiration": false,
            "expiration_days": null,
            "expiration_reenrollment_days": null,
            "enrollment_index_template": "enrollment/index.html",
            "reenrollment_error_template": "",
            "enrollment_success_template": "enrollment/success.html",
            "supported_enrollment_methods": "digital,in_person",
            "transit_agency": 2
        }
    }

[github-actions]

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

[thekaveman]

@lalver1 do you have a local setup for this agency, for testing?

If so, could you run python manage.py dumpdata and copy the fixture into this PR description, just so it is easier to load up and test this PR?

[lalver1]

Thanks for the suggestion @thekaveman , I added the transit agency and one enrollment flow fixture to the description.

[thekaveman]

Thanks, that was helpful. I made a small edit, note the eligibility_start_template on the flow needs to be start--senior.html

Are these Spanish translations that you did based on the existing ones? Answered in Slack.

Is NevCo really their shortname? I'm not seeing this anywhere on their website as branding. Should we be using that in user-facing copy?

[lalver1]

No problem and thanks for making that edit, I overlooked that.

Yep, the Spanish translations are based on the existing ones, the only part that changed was the name of the transit agency.

I was also wondering about NevCo initially but talking with Olivia, it turns out that they do use that shortname. Let me take a screenshot and mention it to her that this is a user-facing copy to double check. I think the alternative would be to use "Nevada County Connects".