Skip to content

Comments

Add platform folder#23995

Closed
camiloa17 wants to merge 3 commits intocalcom:mainfrom
camiloa17:add-platform-folder
Closed

Add platform folder#23995
camiloa17 wants to merge 3 commits intocalcom:mainfrom
camiloa17:add-platform-folder

Conversation

@camiloa17
Copy link

What does this PR do?

  • Fixes #XXXX (GitHub issue number)
  • Fixes CAL-XXXX (Linear issue number - should be visible at the bottom of the GitHub issue description)

Visual Demo (For contributors especially)

A visual demonstration is strongly recommended, for both the original and new change (video / image - any one).

Video Demo (if applicable):

  • Show screen recordings of the issue or feature.
  • Demonstrate how to reproduce the issue, the behavior before and after the change.

Image Demo (if applicable):

  • Add side-by-side screenshots of the original and updated change.
  • Highlight any significant change(s).

Mandatory Tasks (DO NOT REMOVE)

  • I have self-reviewed the code (A decent size PR without self-review might be rejected).
  • I have updated the developer docs in /docs if this PR makes changes that would require a documentation change. If N/A, write N/A here and check the checkbox.
  • I confirm automated tests are in place that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.

How should this be tested?

  • Are there environment variables that should be set?
  • What are the minimal test data to have?
  • What is expected (happy path) to have (input and output)?
  • Any other important info that could help to test that PR

Checklist

  • I haven't read the contributing guide
  • My code doesn't follow the style guidelines of this project
  • I haven't commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I haven't checked if my changes generate no new warnings

@camiloa17 camiloa17 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2025 05:24
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This PR adds an env flag NEXTSKIP_SEED to .env.example. It adjusts ESLint: removes allowTypeImports restriction in app-store scope and adds a no-restricted-imports rule to block ee/ imports under apps/web/app/api/platform/**. A new GitHub Actions workflow fails PRs if imports contain ee/ in TS files. README is replaced with fork-specific content. New API routes are introduced for provider schedules (GET/POST) and provider signup (POST). Seeding is disabled by changing db-seed scripts in root and packages/prisma to echo messages, and the @calcom/prisma#db-seed task is removed from turbo.json.

Possibly related PRs

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a538ba6 and c782a72.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .env.example (1 hunks)
  • .eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/enterprise-check.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/api/platform/providers/[id]/route.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/api/platform/providers/signup/route.ts (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/prisma/package.json (1 hunks)
  • turbo.json (0 hunks)

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the community Created by Linear-GitHub Sync label Sep 23, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team September 23, 2025 05:24
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.

Details:

No release type found in pull request title "Add platform folder". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 23, 2025

@camiloa17 is attempting to deploy a commit to the cal Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ❗️ .env changes contains changes to env variables label Sep 23, 2025
@camiloa17 camiloa17 closed this Sep 23, 2025
@camiloa17 camiloa17 deleted the add-platform-folder branch September 23, 2025 05:24
@dosubot dosubot bot added the platform Anything related to our platform plan label Sep 23, 2025
@camiloa17 camiloa17 restored the add-platform-folder branch September 23, 2025 05:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community Created by Linear-GitHub Sync ❗️ .env changes contains changes to env variables platform Anything related to our platform plan size/XL

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants