Add support for ByRole with name #1127
Merged
+112
−15
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mdjastrzebski
requested changes
Sep 19, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome work @AugustinLF!
The code is indeed much simpler after @MattAgn's #977.
I've added some minor suggests and tweaks to address before we merge this.
…ildren matching is supported
AugustinLF
force-pushed
the
feat/by-role-with-name
branch
from
67b14da
to
188a285
Compare
mdjastrzebski
requested changes
Sep 22, 2022
|
@mdjastrzebski we should be good! |
mdjastrzebski
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job @AugustinLF 🚀 Also big thank you 🙏🏻 to @kiranjd for submitting the initial implementation of this PR as #875.
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 11.2.0 🎉 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Folllow up of #875. I started from scratch given the amount of conflicts.
Closes #827
If merged as is, don't forget to mention @kiranjd as part of the release.
Kudo to @MattAgn's work in #977 which made that a breeze. Look at the diff between this PR and the previously opened one, the code reorg was def the right call.