-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Version within CAMARA_common.yaml shouldn't be "wip" #254
Comments
The whole The problem we have with version field is that in Commonalities v.0.3.0 it was set to 0.4.0. As CAMARA_common.yaml is not to be implemented, not increasing the version this time would not be very harmful.
Increasing version field (it is mandatory in OAS):
looks confusing for me. |
As we introduced for APIs that the release numbering is independent from the (API) versioning, I personally wouldn't be confused if Commonalities would have artefacts which are diverging from the release number. In fact I would even expect the artefacts have their independent version numbers. |
As it was discussed in Commonalities meeting decoupling of CAMARA_common.yaml version from Commonalities version allows to introduce changes even faster than Commonalities versions are released. |
Problem description
Within rc.1 the version in
Commonalities/artifacts/CAMARA_common.yaml
Line 10 in f9f6c49
Expected behavior
A non "wip" version should be set, and referred within the release description/changelog of rc.2
Alternative solution
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: