docs(web-modeler): switch to SBOM dependency list

[wollefitz]

Description

• Closes https://github.com/camunda/web-modeler/issues/4386
• Relates to feat(dependencies): harmonize linkage to dependencies #4277 and https://github.com/camunda/engineering-leadership-team/issues/68

When should this change go live?

• This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support.
• This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week.
• This on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the DevEx team. (apply hold label or convert to draft PR)
• This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (apply alpha or minor label)
• There is no urgency with this change and can be released at any time.

PR Checklist

• My changes are for an already released minor and are in /versioned_docs directory.
• My changes are for the next minor and are in /docs directory (aka /next/).

• My changes require an Engineering review, and I've assigned the Engineering DRI or delegate.
• My changes require a technical writer review, and I've assigned @camunda/tech-writers as a reviewer.

[wollefitz]

Hey @MaxTru and/or @kevinCamunda!

Could you please have a look at the proposed wording of the Web Modeler dependencies section meets our requirements?

• Dependencies: SBOM CycloneDX files with up-to-date lists of third party libraries used and their licenses can be requested on demand.
• Source code: Source code access can be provided on demand.

Do we have to mention SaaS and SM (and their individual components webapp, restapi and websockets) separately or is this sufficient?

[MaxTru]

Hi @wollefitz ,

thanks - looks good! Just please include the email address already.

Note: I will go over the detailed wording once all components have done their part (ensuring consistency and legal aligned wording).

[MaxTru]

Just a small detail wording

[wollefitz]

Additionally requesting a review from @camunda/tech-writers as I'm a bit confused by "on demand" vs "on-demand" - maybe you could assist me 🙂

[christinaausley]

Additionally requesting a review from @camunda/tech-writers as I'm a bit confused by "on demand" vs "on-demand" - maybe you could assist me 🙂

"On demand" is correct here. You might use on-demand as an adjective preceding a noun to describe the noun -- for example, on-demand television".

[wollefitz]

Thanks for having another look! Let's merge this then 🚀