Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't check for lz4 unless building raft #603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

cole-miller
Copy link
Contributor

@cole-miller cole-miller commented Feb 21, 2024

Right now the build is broken when liblz4-dev is not installed and --enable-build-raft is not used. This was an oversight on my part when developing #568.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller cole.miller@canonical.com

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6134a79) 81.16% compared to head (74d2e4d) 81.23%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #603      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.16%   81.23%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         189      191       +2     
  Lines       26742    27033     +291     
  Branches     4859     4933      +74     
==========================================
+ Hits        21704    21959     +255     
- Misses       3455     3480      +25     
- Partials     1583     1594      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
@cole-miller cole-miller changed the title Test no-lz4 configuration in CI Don't check for lz4 unless building raft Feb 22, 2024
@cole-miller cole-miller marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2024 13:42
@cole-miller
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is needed to fix PPA builds

@cole-miller cole-miller merged commit 0dcd0a3 into canonical:master Feb 23, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants