Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "fix: explicitly apply minio-service with name (#151)" #154

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit b99aad8 as described in #153. This fix is instead being moved to the kfp-api charm of kfp-operators.

@ca-scribner ca-scribner marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2023 21:09
@ca-scribner ca-scribner requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2023 21:09
@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

DnPlas commented Nov 20, 2023

Thanks @ca-scribner, based on canonical/kfp-operators#387 this change makes sense. I think besides reverting this commit, we should also ensure that the service name we share in the relation data is not just the application name. We could have a var self._minio_service_name = self.app.name in case we want to change this in the future.

@ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done. Ready for re-review

Copy link
Contributor

@DnPlas DnPlas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ca-scribner LGTM

@ca-scribner ca-scribner merged commit e1be061 into main Nov 21, 2023
7 checks passed
@ca-scribner ca-scribner deleted the KF-4984-remove-extra-minio-service branch November 21, 2023 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants