Update event security logs documentation regarding logging charm operations #1141
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ations Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com>
marceloneppel
added
the
not bug or enhancement
dragomirp
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2025
a-velasco
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
For the SSDLC requirements, the event security logging documentation should also inform whether the operations performed by the charm are also logged.
Solution
Port of canonical/postgresql-operator#1253.
Document that the charm operations call the workload, which already logs the relevant underlying operations.
Checklist