-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
[MISC] Use more meaningful group naming for multi-group tests #625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #625 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.89% 70.89%
=======================================
Files 12 12
Lines 3048 3048
Branches 539 539
=======================================
Hits 2161 2161
Misses 771 771
Partials 116 116 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm! Left a comment on the k8s PR.
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.group(1) | ||
@pytest.mark.group("main_tests") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something like high availability might be a more meaningful label.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ha_tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops, this is different from K8s: we're on test_new_relations
, not self_healing
- what about new_relations_tests
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
merging this so it gets out of the way - we can always create follow ups if better ideas come!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you taking care! IMHO, you can update to MySQL as well (talk to Paulo). ;-)
|
||
|
||
@pytest.mark.group(1) | ||
@pytest.mark.group("main_tests") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ha_tests?
VM port of canonical/postgresql-k8s-operator#707