Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency stylelint-prettier to v2 #119

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 18, 2021

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 17, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
stylelint-prettier ^1.1.2 -> ^2.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

prettier/stylelint-prettier

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Increase the minimum required versions of stylelint, prettier and node. No code changes have been required and v1.2.0 works with stylelint v14, however continuing to test old these old unsupported versions is getting more difficult thanks to internal API changes. (#​198)

  • Minimum stylelint version is now v14 (drop support for v9.5 through v13.x)
  • Minimum prettier version is now v2 (drop support for v1.x)
  • Minimum node requirements is now ^12.22.0 || ^14.17.0 || >=16.0.0 (drop support for v8.x and v10.x)

v1.2.0

Compare Source

  • Do not trigger prettier for .svelte and .component.html (angular) files. This avoids errors. Prettifying a subset of the file (i.e. just contents of <style> tags) using stylelint feels like unneeded work if you're about to run prettier over the whole file anyway (#​160)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because other commits have been found.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2021 12:44
@ibmdotcom-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ibmdotcom-bot commented Nov 17, 2021

@jeffchew jeffchew added the Ready to merge Label for the pull requests that are ready to merge label Nov 17, 2021
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-prettier-2.x branch 2 times, most recently from ee6589b to 11da86f Compare November 17, 2021 15:12
@jeffchew jeffchew removed the Ready to merge Label for the pull requests that are ready to merge label Nov 17, 2021
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-prettier-2.x branch from 11da86f to 6ed9960 Compare November 17, 2021 15:36
@jeffchew jeffchew added the Ready to merge Label for the pull requests that are ready to merge label Nov 18, 2021
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-prettier-2.x branch 4 times, most recently from ffc3ab9 to cc69d23 Compare November 18, 2021 02:40
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot removed the Ready to merge Label for the pull requests that are ready to merge label Nov 18, 2021
@kodiakhq
Copy link

kodiakhq bot commented Nov 18, 2021

This PR currently has a merge conflict. Please resolve this and then re-add the Ready to merge label.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-prettier-2.x branch 4 times, most recently from 0f8ade8 to 797daa5 Compare November 18, 2021 03:23
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-prettier-2.x branch from 797daa5 to 3cb542d Compare November 18, 2021 03:38
@jeffchew jeffchew added the Ready to merge Label for the pull requests that are ready to merge label Nov 18, 2021
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 02a034b into master Nov 18, 2021
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the renovate/stylelint-prettier-2.x branch November 18, 2021 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready to merge Label for the pull requests that are ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants