Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add github action to publish docs. #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 5, 2020
Merged

Add github action to publish docs. #8

merged 2 commits into from
May 5, 2020

Conversation

EricWF
Copy link
Contributor

@EricWF EricWF commented May 4, 2020

This change add a placeholder action which:

(A) Authenticates with gcloud using the appropriate GCP AS.
(B) Copies the docs/ folder as-is into
www.carbon-lang.dev/test-doc-root/

When this action is merged into master, it must be updated to
make it run on pushes to master as well.

This change add a placeholder action which:

(A) Authenticates with gcloud using the appropriate GCP AS.
(B) Copies the docs/ folder as-is into
www.carbon-lang.dev/test-doc-root/

When this action is merged into master, it must be updated to
make it run on pushes to master as well.
@EricWF EricWF merged commit 3d5ebe1 into master May 5, 2020
@EricWF EricWF deleted the test-doc-setup branch May 5, 2020 00:11
chandlerc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2022
* Add github action to publish docs.

This change add a placeholder action which:

(A) Authenticates with gcloud using the appropriate GCP AS.
(B) Copies the docs/ folder as-is into
www.carbon-lang.dev/test-doc-root/
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
…4253)

There's not much mangling happening yet - but Run -> main (and some
overloading numbering happening, maybe LLVM is doing that 'helpfully'
under the hood?) is enough to demonstrate this improvement/fix.

Ah, here it is:
```
#0  llvm::ValueSymbolTable::makeUniqueName (this=0x50287fe5b6c0, V=0x50287fe827e8, UniqueName="F") at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/ValueSymbolTable.cpp:45
#1  0x000055555c40f964 in llvm::ValueSymbolTable::reinsertValue (this=0x50287fe5b6c0, V=0x50287fe827e8) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/ValueSymbolTable.cpp:100
#2  0x000055555c2a91df in llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Function>::addNodeToList (this=0x50287fd16f18, V=0x50287fe827e8) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/SymbolTableListTraitsImpl.h:75
#3  0x000055555c2a90e5 in llvm::iplist_impl<llvm::simple_ilist<llvm::Function>, llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Function> >::insert (this=0x50287fd16f18, where=..., New=0x50287fe827e8)
    at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:166
#4  0x000055555c27fef2 in llvm::iplist_impl<llvm::simple_ilist<llvm::Function>, llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Function> >::push_back (this=0x50287fd16f18, val=0x50287fe827e8) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:250
#5  0x000055555c27faeb in llvm::Function::Function (this=0x50287fe827e8, Ty=0x50287fd43058, Linkage=llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, AddrSpace=0, name="F", ParentModule=0x50287fd16f00) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:521
#6  0x0000555559441f95 in llvm::Function::Create (Ty=0x50287fd43058, Linkage=llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, AddrSpace=0, N="F", M=0x50287fd16f00) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:175
#7  0x000055555c27ebac in llvm::Function::Create (Ty=0x50287fd43058, Linkage=llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, N="F", M=...) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:398
#8  0x0000555558ce7bb5 in Carbon::Lower::FileContext::BuildFunctionDecl (this=0x7fffffffc438, function_id=...) at toolchain/lower/file_context.cpp:257
```

That's where LLVM decides to make a new name (name.number) when asked to
create a new global with the same name as an existing global.

It's not a valid mangling scheme - since the name won't be stable
between different compilations, but it is enough to make
single-compilation code build/run for now.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants