-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CIP-0074 | Set minPoolCost to 0 #358
Conversation
👍👍🏻👍🏼👍🏽👍🏾👍🏿 |
@ADARobinHood as I just wrote in #360 (comment) (so I'm copying parts of the text) there's a lot of common ground between these 2 proposals as you've observed from the Cardano Forum thread especially where @TobiasFancee jumped in: https://forum.cardano.org/t/cip-69-set-minpoolcost-to-0/109309/37 Discord has been used to compare & contrast several PoS proposals and some suggested variations so please let me invite you there as well: my apologies if you've already been there but I can't line up your name with any of the participants: ... nice to see this begin on the Cardano Forum with such enthusiastic discussion. I've recommended an upcoming Biweekly CIP Editors' meeting to have a scope of all CIPs with this theme (revisions to PoS rewards & incentives), since a couple more of them including yours have come in recently. If such an agenda is confirmed I'll post it here. The Discord where we have these meetings online (invite) also has a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW so we can review this properly, please rename the document currently at this pathname: CIP 69? - Set minPoolCost to 0
to: README.md
and move the file into a descriptively named subdirectory: preferably something short beginning with CIP
but not using a number.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Formatting corrections
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo fix
Co-authored-by: Matthias Benkort <5680256+KtorZ@users.noreply.github.com>
We discussed this proposal in today's editors meeting (number 57). As for other proposals regarding the reward sharing scheme or the ledger rule, the proposal shall be merged as |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes
Co-authored-by: Matthias Benkort <5680256+KtorZ@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(@ADARobinHood can you also adjust the folder name to 'CIP-0074' 🙏) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All in order as per yesterday's CIP meeting resolution & the new Path to Active.
(proposal latest draft)