Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: maven 4.0.0 prebuilds #333

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

chore: maven 4.0.0 prebuilds #333

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

carlossg
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@carlossg
Copy link
Owner Author

Looks like the gpg key used to sign 4.0.0 alpha is not in the apache maven KEYS file @bmarwell ?

# gpg: key D433A5AD: accepted non self-signed user ID "Benjamin Marwell <bmarwell@apache.org>"
# + gpg --batch --verify apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz.asc apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz
# gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 27 15:39:00 2023 UTC using ? key ID 599C5736

and

# + gpg --batch --import --quiet /tmp/KEYS
# + gpg --batch --verify apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz.asc apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz
# gpg: Signature made Fri 27 Jan 2023 03:39:00 PM UTC
# gpg:                using EDDSA key 073F7A9345756F3B40CDB99E6C70A3B7599C5736
# gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

@bmarwell
Copy link

I don't remember creating a release! Will check back with the team.

@gnodet
Copy link

gnodet commented Feb 14, 2023

Looks like the gpg key used to sign 4.0.0 alpha is not in the apache maven KEYS file @bmarwell ?

# gpg: key D433A5AD: accepted non self-signed user ID "Benjamin Marwell <bmarwell@apache.org>"
# + gpg --batch --verify apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz.asc apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz
# gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 27 15:39:00 2023 UTC using ? key ID 599C5736

and

# + gpg --batch --import --quiet /tmp/KEYS
# + gpg --batch --verify apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz.asc apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz
# gpg: Signature made Fri 27 Jan 2023 03:39:00 PM UTC
# gpg:                using EDDSA key 073F7A9345756F3B40CDB99E6C70A3B7599C5736
# gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Hey @carlossg ! My bad, it seems I forgot to add my signing key to the KEYS file. Let me fix that asap.

@gnodet
Copy link

gnodet commented Feb 14, 2023

Looks like the gpg key used to sign 4.0.0 alpha is not in the apache maven KEYS file @bmarwell ?

# gpg: key D433A5AD: accepted non self-signed user ID "Benjamin Marwell <bmarwell@apache.org>"
# + gpg --batch --verify apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz.asc apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz
# gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 27 15:39:00 2023 UTC using ? key ID 599C5736

and

# + gpg --batch --import --quiet /tmp/KEYS
# + gpg --batch --verify apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz.asc apache-maven-4.0.0-alpha-4-bin.tar.gz
# gpg: Signature made Fri 27 Jan 2023 03:39:00 PM UTC
# gpg:                using EDDSA key 073F7A9345756F3B40CDB99E6C70A3B7599C5736
# gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Hey @carlossg ! My bad, it seems I forgot to add my signing key to the KEYS file. Let me fix that asap.

It should be fixed now.

@carlossg carlossg force-pushed the maven-4 branch 2 times, most recently from 574abed to 4e3ea96 Compare February 15, 2023 10:43
@carlossg
Copy link
Owner Author

carlossg commented Feb 16, 2023

The problem now is that amazoncorretto and liberica are based on Centos 7 and have gpg 2.0 that doesn't support the signing key algorithm EDDSA used by @gnodet signature

gpg: Can't check signature: Invalid public key algorithm

@bmarwell
Copy link

I believe you need at least GnuPG 2.0.24 which was released in 2014. See this changelog:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2014q2/000345.html

@carlossg carlossg closed this Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants