-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reproduced results and updated pygaggle/docs/experiments-msmarco-passage-subset.md #309
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Added "What's going on?" toggle blocks to illustrate the effect of re-ranking on the top hit's relevancy to a certain For each "What's going on?" toggle block
|
Thanks for doing this! Could you please also add |
Added |
scores | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Let's also download MS MARCO passage dataset to visualize the actual passages after re-ranking. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we only downloading it to visualize it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, since the data/msmarco_ans_small
itself does not include the passages. Any suggestion on how we can only download the passages corresponding to data/msmarco_ans_small
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How were we reranking without this though?
Successfully reproduced the same numerical results for
pygaggle/docs/experiments-msmarco-passage-subset.md
on a Colab env with a T4 GPU.Encountered a small issue with the python dependencies needed to evaluate using monoBERT.
The error log was
Fix: