-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added descriptions of the EIA861 data #3808
added descriptions of the EIA861 data #3808
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lots of ideas! Thanks for filling in these blank sections!
I have some thoughts on the "Background" section as well. I think it would be nice to add something similar to the current 860 docs with the Schedules fleshed out:
As of 2024, the EIA-861 Form is organized into the following schedules:
You can find the schedules in the most recent form instructions (https://www.eia.gov/survey/form/eia_861/instructions.pdf)
Another thought that is out of scope but I want to mention is the harvesting process. We don't really mention this in our documentation, but we should! It's an integral part of how we process EIA860 and 923 data (notably, not 861). And feels like something that should come up on the Data Source pages or somewhere else.
Please could you enlighten me on how this harvesting process works so I'll know what to add to the docs |
Yes! I will make a new issue about this with some detail. We don't have a address this as part of this PR. |
26c53d6
to
5d1cd12
Compare
…ncy9ice/pudl into edit-data-sources-information
312d9f0
Overview
Closes this Google Season of Docs Task:
Update the information of data sources that have missing information under their headings.
Note:
Only the EIA861 data had missing information in its headings so this was updated.
What problem does this address?
This helps users to know more information about the data sources ingested into the PUDL database
Testing
How did you make sure this worked? How can a reviewer verify this?
I ran the command
make docs-build
and checked if my changes reflected correctly locally@aesharpe @zaneselvans