Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix for Qiskit Layout import #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

burgholzer
Copy link
Member

This PR fixes a bug in the import of initial layout information from Qiskit that results in a segfault when trying to import a circuit containing layout information but not containing an ancillary register.

@burgholzer burgholzer added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 24, 2022
@burgholzer burgholzer self-assigned this Jun 24, 2022
@burgholzer burgholzer enabled auto-merge (squash) June 24, 2022 16:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #133 (a6e682f) into main (92bbd82) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #133   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   82.1%   82.1%           
=====================================
  Files         44      44           
  Lines       7300    7300           
=====================================
  Hits        5999    5999           
  Misses      1301    1301           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 92bbd82...a6e682f. Read the comment docs.

@burgholzer burgholzer merged commit c5a87d8 into main Jun 24, 2022
burgholzer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
@burgholzer burgholzer deleted the fix-qiskit-layout-import branch December 2, 2024 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant