-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Geant4 11.1+ #768
Merged
Merged
Support Geant4 11.1+ #768
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
75f5e5c
Add header for forward-declared class
sethrj 3d6dbaa
Fudge lower cross section value if below energy cutoff
sethrj ce3ad5e
Loosen tolerance presumably due to slightly different cross sections
sethrj 722ee3b
Adjust logger to work with newer Geant4 interface (global-V11-01-01)
sethrj 09ffeb5
REVERTME: work with geant4-dev
sethrj 007186b
Revert "Fudge lower cross section value if below energy cutoff"
sethrj a910dc0
Override new default Rayleigh 'MinKinEnergyPrim' when we create the p…
sethrj fa2189b
Add Rayleigh to the ignored list for demo-geant-integration for now
sethrj 665f1e2
Always validate the grid spacing
sethrj fa3bc31
Add a context exception to describe failures during import
sethrj 060fa54
Revert "REVERTME: work with geant4-dev"
sethrj ddcac15
Update src/celeritas/ext/detail/GeantPhysicsList.cc
sethrj File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why ignoring Rayleigh in demo as we now introduce a tweak to set the MinKinEnergyPrim to the Geant411.0 value (100keV)? Do we need both (i.e., ignoring the Rayleigh process and reverting the MinKinEneryPrim for 11.1+)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The tweak only works if we control the physics list, but we're forced to accept the defaults when loading
G4EmStandardPhysics
as part ofFTFP_BERT
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Between the physics list construction and the run manager initialization (in which physics tables are built), the default value can be overwritten through
G4ProcessManager
(setting necessary parameters to an individual model associated with a process). Anyway, okay for now, but we definitely need the better handle for the equal grid spacing requirement (probably supporting multiple lambda tables per model or creating physics data directly from Geant4 cross sections).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha, that's cool. Yes, medium to long term we definitely need more generic ways of handling cross sections: especially of course once we start including any sort of hadronic reactions.