Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CI to VecGeom 1.2.3 #819

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

sethrj
Copy link
Member

@sethrj sethrj commented Jun 20, 2023

This version of VecGeom supports CMS run 3 and also fixes some tracking bugs with the polycone.

@sethrj sethrj added documentation Documentation, examples, tests, and CI core Software engineering infrastructure labels Jun 20, 2023
@sethrj sethrj requested review from pcanal and amandalund and removed request for amandalund June 20, 2023 12:55
celeritas_add_device_test(celeritas/ext/Vecgeom
LINK_LIBRARIES VecGeom::vecgeom
FILTER
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Odd name for the feature :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It invokes the --gtest_filter argument, so you could use it to simply exclude tests if you only provide a single argument.

@sethrj sethrj merged commit ada029b into celeritas-project:develop Jun 22, 2023
@sethrj sethrj deleted the vecgeom-123 branch June 22, 2023 16:53
@sethrj sethrj added external Dependencies and framework-oriented features and removed documentation Documentation, examples, tests, and CI core Software engineering infrastructure labels Nov 14, 2023
@sethrj sethrj added the minor Minor internal changes or fixes label Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
external Dependencies and framework-oriented features minor Minor internal changes or fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants