-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test!: removes e2e benchmark tests for blocks >8MB, uses main branch for others #3866
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The benchmark tests |
…-for-benchmark-tests
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the end-to-end benchmark tests by removing several test cases focused on larger block sizes (32MB and 64MB) and refactoring the code to utilize a dynamic function for retrieving application versions. This streamlines the testing process by focusing on 8MB block sizes and enhancing code maintainability. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
…-for-benchmark-tests
102cc65
MemoryRequest: resource.MustParse("12Gi"), | ||
MemoryLimit: resource.MustParse("12Gi"), | ||
CPU: resource.MustParse("8"), | ||
Volume: resource.MustParse("20Gi"), | ||
}, | ||
TxClientsResource: testnet.Resources{ | ||
MemoryRequest: resource.MustParse("1Gi"), | ||
MemoryLimit: resource.MustParse("3Gi"), | ||
CPU: resource.MustParse("2"), | ||
Volume: resource.MustParse("1Gi"), | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the indentation looks off and golangci-lint is complaining: https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/actions/runs/10950431497/job/30405641643?pr=3866#step:5:32
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
once you fix lint I'll reapprove @staheri14
manifest.Validators = 50 | ||
manifest.TxClients = 50 | ||
manifest.BlobSequences = 2 | ||
return runBenchmarkTest(logger, "LargeNetworkBigBlock8MB", manifest) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func LargeNetworkBigBlock32MB(logger *log.Logger) error { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this was part of the exported Go API https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/v2@v2.2.0/test/e2e/benchmark so we can probably drop the !
from the PR title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm good with removing these
in theory, we'll get a pulumi backend for knuu, which would allow us to use these, but we can add them back then
Closes #3865