docs: authored blobs audit report

[rootulp]

Closes #3992

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the README.md file of the celestia-app project, specifically updating the audit section. A new entry for an audit conducted by Informal Systems on September 20, 2024, is added, including a version identifier and a link to the audit report. Additionally, the formatting of the audit table is altered, changing the hyphen to a plus sign for the new entry. These changes enhance the documentation related to audits without affecting other sections of the file.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Added a new audit entry for Informal Systems (September 20, 2024) including version and report links; changed the formatting of the audit table.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Link the audit PDF from the README (#3992)	✅

Possibly related PRs

• docs: add v2 audit report #3646: This PR also updates the README.md file to add an audit entry for Informal Systems, indicating a direct connection in the changes made to the same file and similar content focus.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

172-177: LGTM! Consider using a release tag for consistency.

The new audit entry has been successfully added to the table, following the existing format and providing all necessary information. The link to the audit report is correctly formatted and follows the established pattern.

However, I noticed that the Version column uses a commit hash (306c587) instead of a release tag like the other entries. While this is valid, consider using a release tag for consistency if one is available that corresponds to this commit.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f217064 and a5b83d6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• docs/audit/informal-systems-authored-blobs.pdf is excluded by !**/*.pdf

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

[cmwaters]

Thanks!