feat(eds/store): remove corrupted blocks from store

[distractedm1nd]

Related to #2335

If an OpShardFail is found or corruption is detected from GetSharesByNamespace, the shard is removed

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2625 (6ebde81) into main (a3220f4) will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 37.50%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2625      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.15%   51.05%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         158      158              
  Lines       10558    10638      +80     
==========================================
+ Hits         5401     5431      +30     
- Misses       4681     4732      +51     
+ Partials      476      475       -1     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
blob/blob.go	62.68% <ø> (-6.21%)	⬇️
nodebuilder/share/constructors.go	8.92% <0.00%> (-1.28%)	⬇️
nodebuilder/share/module.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
share/getters/store.go	72.41% <0.00%> (-10.49%)	⬇️
share/share.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
share/eds/metrics.go	19.41% <28.57%> (+0.66%)	⬆️
share/p2p/peers/manager.go	72.18% <43.75%> (-1.84%)	⬇️
share/eds/store.go	63.75% <93.33%> (+3.75%)	⬆️
share/eds/accessor_cache.go	38.94% <100.00%> (+4.11%)	⬆️
share/p2p/peers/options.go	58.97% <100.00%> (+7.45%)	⬆️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

[ramin]

made some minor comments from perspective of a new set of eyes on the project. I think logging shard failures and removals would be super useful for both a node runner, but also as it feels like this doesn't solve the issue, but is a step towards more work in this area.

[walldiss]

Looks good, just some code structuring suggestions and one small issue

[renaynay]

Lint and pls check swamp tests locally

[walldiss]

Small one left