-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(nodebuilder/header): get rid of InitStore
#2678
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2678 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 51.48% 51.36% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 159 159
Lines 10677 10676 -1
==========================================
- Hits 5497 5484 -13
- Misses 4707 4715 +8
- Partials 473 477 +4
... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes 📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK. Have you tested locally?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My intuition says me like there might be something subtle we miss by doing so. I clearly remember we had to do it, but don't remember why.
Does it works properly on non and initialised node node? Also, the test change is suspicious
@Wondertan Yes works for inited and non-inited nodes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like there is no blocker anymore for this simplification.
Thanks for this @renaynay!
Not needed anymore
Not needed anymore