-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: stop using pubsub fork #887
Conversation
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-core v0.17.0 | ||
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-kad-dht v0.16.0 | ||
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-peerstore v0.6.0 | ||
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub v0.7.0 | ||
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub v0.7.1-0.20220701163738-60cf38003244 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we use a concrete released/tagged version?
https://github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub/releases/tag/v0.7.1
instead of
libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub@60cf380
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to, but unfortunately no. @vyzo didn't tag a new release for all the commits in the master, and probably had reasons for that, but maybe he will change his mind ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey guys, i can tag a new release for v0.8 by week's end.
The only reason i havent rushed to it is the upgrade to depend on go-libp2p (v20), now that it has monorepoized, so i wanted to give it some bake time.
In the future pls ask when you need a release so that we can coordinate!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks for your response!
We can keep this PR open until a new pubsub release then, no rush from our side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
guess we'll just wait on next release from pubsub
We cannot rely directly on upstream unless libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub#497 is merged + we anyway have to wait for PubSub to be updated to v0.22.0 and so as we #1029 |
hey guys, I punted on a release exactly because of this.
Let me know how you want to proceed. |
Hey @vyzo, second option with 0.8.0 works fine for us. Still, no rush on our side. Thanks |
As
, we no longer need to rely on our fork and can directly use pubsub
This PR, also silently bumps up the libp2p patch version with a bug fix that affects us.
Closes #436