Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mocha_versions.js #1797

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Update mocha_versions.js #1797

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

mindstyle85
Copy link
Collaborator

@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 commented Nov 18, 2024

for tomorrow

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the Mocha version tags for improved compatibility and performance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the mochaVersions constant in the .vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js file. It updates the values for the keys "node-latest-tag" and "node-latest-sha", changing the tag from "v0.20.1-mocha" to "v0.20.2-mocha" and the SHA hash from "353141fb5a0a33c10a8678ac6e92a90b02f74dbd" to "2dc9cce7b5dffc14fd4fe156d2aa9869318e0f68".

Changes

File Change Summary
.vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js Updated mochaVersions constant: changed "node-latest-tag" to "v0.20.2-mocha" and "node-latest-sha" to "2dc9cce7b5dffc14fd4fe156d2aa9869318e0f68"

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jcstein

🐇 In the garden, I hop with glee,
Mocha versions updated, oh what a spree!
From v0.20.1 to v0.20.2,
With a new SHA, it’s fresh and true!
Hopping along, let’s code away,
With every change, we brighten the day! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa0ceaf and c146e26.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
🚀 Deployed preview to https://celestiaorg.github.io/docs-preview/./pr-1797/
on branch main at 2024-11-18 15:33 UTC

Copy link
Member

@jcstein jcstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. but we should wait until announced, as noted in description

@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 merged commit 2a2d6e4 into main Nov 19, 2024
6 checks passed
@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 deleted the mindstyle85-patch-2 branch November 19, 2024 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants