You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The new path and border anchors don't have shorthands, you have to use them in dictionary form. It would be better if they hand shorthands like the named anchors.
We could use the exact same shortcut as named anchors, allow them as dot separated strings. However this may get tricky if a float is used for a path anchor, or an integer is used with intersections. Another option might be allowing them as a tuple in the form (name, anchor) although this may conflict with some already existing coordinates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The new path and border anchors don't have shorthands, you have to use them in dictionary form. It would be better if they hand shorthands like the named anchors.
We could use the exact same shortcut as named anchors, allow them as dot separated strings. However this may get tricky if a float is used for a path anchor, or an integer is used with intersections. Another option might be allowing them as a tuple in the form
(name, anchor)
although this may conflict with some already existing coordinates.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: