-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Small update to text in section 2.3 regarding character sets #468
Comments
As in the PR description (above) the suggested change has already been discussed in this comment of #237 and subsequent ones. The last comment was on November 1st, and support was voiced by @ChrisBarker-NOAA. If there are no more comments, except regarding minor technical details, I suggest that proposed changes can be implemented via PR#470 on November 22. |
As Unicode contains many digits outside of 0-9, I think the term digit needs to be clarified similar to letter. I have made a suggestion in the PR simply adding a sentence after and similar to the sentence clarifying the meaning of letter. |
OK. The ASCII "underscore" is the Unicode "low line". There is also a Unicode "combining low line" (and probably others). So, perhaps to be really clear we should specify "underscore" as well.
|
Thanks Ethan! In an attempt to avoid triple repetitions I suggest a small rewording which I hope does not change the meaning. The first paragraph is then:
I will put this in the associated PR. |
Title
Small update to text in section 2.3 character sets.
Moderator
not yet
Requirement Summary
In Section 2.3 the currently allowed character set must be described more precisely to avoid ambiguity in across different languages, and the Unicode capabilities of netCDF should be mentioned.
Technical Proposal Summary
The two first sentences of Section 2.3 currently reads as follows
Benefits
Data producers and software developers will have an up-to-date and accurate description of the intention of the CF conventions.
Status Quo
The current imprecision may lead to errors and mistakes when writing data or software.
Associated pull request
#470
Detailed Proposal
The first paragraph of section 2.3 is suggested to change as follows (bold is new text,
stricken overis deleted text):Part of the suggested changes have already been discussed in #237, in particular in this comment and the subsequent ones.
Note that the inlined reference/link to the netCDF documentation goes directly to Appendix B because the local link within the NUG to Appendix B is dead.
EDIT 2023-11-8: Changed the link to NUG Appendix B as per email from @ethanrd.
EDIT 2023-11-11: Based on review comments the suggested text has be updated, see this comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: