Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Link Rot] Documentation Link to NetCDF User Guide is 404 #223

Closed
benjwadams opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[Link Rot] Documentation Link to NetCDF User Guide is 404 #223

benjwadams opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@benjwadams
Copy link

In attempting to research what the exact allowable format for relative time units for CF section 4.4 for ioos/compliance-checker#947, I found a broken link referenced for the NetCDF Users Guide at http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/user_guide.html

It seems the NUG now resides at https://docs.unidata.ucar.edu/nug/current/index.html .

Unless Unidata decides to forward requests from the former URL to the latter, it'd likely be good to update the link, which would be relatively straightforward. However, I'm not sure how your internal processes for backporting link fixes to documents takes place, as the same link exists in the current draft version as well as a number of other older versions of the standard.

@benjwadams benjwadams added the question Further information is requested or discussion invited label Apr 17, 2023
@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @benjwadams

Thanks for pointing this out. As far as I can see, there isn't a reference to the NUG in section 4.4, but there is a reference to UDUNITS, which takes you to the list of references at the end of the document. In that list, the link to NUG is given as http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/user_guide.html, which doesn't work, as you say. Is this what you mean?

We should fix it, so I'll change this to a defect issue. As far as I know, we don't attempt to fix previous versions.

Cheers

Jonathan

@JonathanGregory JonathanGregory removed the question Further information is requested or discussion invited label Apr 18, 2023
@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

I have opened a new defect issue for this in the conventions repo, so I'll close this one now. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants