Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

290 parse error #321

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 1, 2017
Merged

290 parse error #321

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 1, 2017

Conversation

TheRealAgentK
Copy link
Collaborator

Additional refactoring to ignore the PARSE_ERRORs mentioned in #290. Current tests pass and my own real life test setup works too, now.

@ryaneberly Would you mind reviewing it again and if you think it's good to go, merge into dev? :)

@TheRealAgentK TheRealAgentK requested a review from ryaneberly July 1, 2017 03:54
ryaneberly added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2017
@ryaneberly
Copy link
Contributor

I think it's about ready. Looks great.
I noticed 3 places in CFLint.java where it was calling both reportRule and fireCFLintException -in areas you had not changed. I fixed those in dev.

@ryaneberly ryaneberly merged commit 813f81c into cflint:dev Jul 1, 2017
@TheRealAgentK
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah - yeah. I didn't change those because you said initially I should look for the exception being fired for PARSE_ERROR only - and wasn't sure what it'd do for PLUGIN_ERROR.

@TheRealAgentK TheRealAgentK deleted the 290-ParseError branch July 2, 2017 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants