Add missing parameter showDiff and make docstring "documentationable" #397
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@astorije you are indeed correct. FYI the docs are written in dox which does indeed ignore Unsure why these were initially written as |
|
Fair enough, thanks for the update! |
keithamus
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2015
Add missing parameter showDiff and make docstring "documentationable"
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I discussed some time ago about this on #382 with @keithamus.
I couldn't find a documentation on how to make a docstring appear on the doc site, so I made the assumption that docstrings starting with
/*!were ignored and those starting with/**were added to the web pages. Please make fun of me if I am completely mistaken.This goes along with chaijs/chaijs.github.io#80.