-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
64-bit core option? #264
Comments
What would be the use-case? Caliptra doesn't have that much addressable memory. |
Caliptra (and MCU in particular) is connected to the "Rest of SOC": SoC and multi-chiplet design physical address space can easily exceed 4 GB. One of advantages of RV was and still is availability of 64-bit microcontroller cores, which can address > 4 GB directly, plus higher performance of 64-bit cores. Area/gate count difference between 64-bit and 32-bit microcontroller cores is small/negligible. This is why RV 64-bit microcontroller cores became popular in SoC designs. |
Ah, so this question is specifically for subsystem. + @bharatpillilli |
We would love to have that option available for the industry. @solomatnikov - please let me know if you would like to contribute it to the ecosystem? |
I can take a look at that next month or in April. I think it would be cleaner and easier if both cores are switched to 64-bit. How do you envision implementation of 64-bit core option? Is it important to have hypervisor support in these cores? |
Any plans for a 64-bit processor core option?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: