Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(python3-streams) fix AU script #2575

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TheCakeIsNaOH
Copy link
Member

Description

The zip directory naming is inconsistent, this directly uses the filenames to find the appropriate license and copyright files.

Motivation and Context

Fixes #2555

How Has this Been Tested?

Tested on Win10 and in test env

Screenshot (if appropriate, usually isn't needed):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Migrated package (a package has been migrated from another repository)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this repository.
  • My change requires a change to documentation (this usually means the notes in the description of a package).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (this usually means the notes in the description of a package).
  • I have updated the package description and it is less than 4000 characters.
  • All files are up to date with the latest Contributing Guidelines
  • The added/modified package passed install/uninstall in the Chocolatey Test Environment(https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-test-environment/). Note that we don't support the use of any other environment.
  • The changes only affect a single package (not including meta package).

The zip directory naming is inconsistent, this directly uses the filename to find
the appropriate license and copyright files.
@TheCakeIsNaOH TheCakeIsNaOH requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2024 04:45
@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

✅ Package verification completed without issues. PR is now pending human review

@sigma67
Copy link

sigma67 commented Nov 26, 2024

Is there any ETA on this PR? Since there has been no activity in 10 days

@sigma67
Copy link

sigma67 commented Nov 27, 2024

@JPRuskin could you kindly review? it would be nice to have a package for 3.13 almost 2 months after its release

@rob-neobim
Copy link

@JPRuskin @sigma67 Just a +1 here. I'm not sure there's anything I can do to help except vote this PR up.

@rob-neobim
Copy link

@AdmiringWorm Perhaps you could review this?

@pauby
Copy link
Member

pauby commented Dec 3, 2024

@rob-neobim @sigma67 Please don't ping people on PR's. The community team will get to it whentime allows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

(python) Outdated, build failing with null
5 participants