Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Protein Mutations #618

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
Mar 18, 2020
Merged

[WIP] Protein Mutations #618

merged 49 commits into from
Mar 18, 2020

Conversation

dominicrufa
Copy link
Contributor

make ring closure work

@dominicrufa
Copy link
Contributor Author

seems that checks are failing due to openmoltools issues

perses/rjmc/geometry.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
perses/rjmc/geometry.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jchodera
Copy link
Member

jchodera commented Mar 5, 2020

trying to fix topology_proposal with monumental failure

@dominicrufa : Anything I can help with? Happy to find time for a quick call or slack chat!

@dominicrufa
Copy link
Contributor Author

dominicrufa commented Mar 5, 2020

@dominicrufa : Anything I can help with? Happy to find time for a quick call or slack chat!

I'm being melodramatic. didn't even break as many tests as i thought. there is an irritating problem with the atom map expressions where using the oechem.OEExprOpts_IntType causes faulty atom mappings, though, but i'll look at it in the morning. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@jchodera jchodera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, looks good! Left some minor comments!

perses/tests/test_geometry_engine.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
perses/tests/test_geometry_engine.py Show resolved Hide resolved
perses/tests/testsystems.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
perses/tests/testsystems.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
perses/utils/openeye.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@hannahbrucemacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

Can we look more at the implicitSolvent situation? It's called in a bunch of different examples and tests, sometimes set to None, and sometimes set to 'implicitSolvent' : app.OBC2

For now, I'm adding a comment wherever I see it that it's not supported yet anyway, but I don't see the harm of it being set to None here. I'll add an issue to the tracker #654. If the tests pass, I'm going to merge and cut a release.

@hannahbrucemacdonald hannahbrucemacdonald merged commit 6e5c193 into master Mar 18, 2020
@jchodera jchodera deleted the new_ring_closing branch March 18, 2020 21:02
@jchodera
Copy link
Member

Can we look more at the implicitSolvent situation? It's called in a bunch of different examples and tests, sometimes set to None, and sometimes set to 'implicitSolvent' : app.OBC2

I'll prioritize fixing this!

For now, I'm adding a comment wherever I see it that it's not supported yet anyway, but I don't see the harm of it being set to None here. I'll add an issue to the tracker #654. If the tests pass, I'm going to merge and cut a release.

Sounds fine!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants