Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH] HNSW should fork #2124

Merged
merged 54 commits into from
May 6, 2024
Merged

[ENH] HNSW should fork #2124

merged 54 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

HammadB
Copy link
Collaborator

@HammadB HammadB commented May 3, 2024

Description of changes

Summarize the changes made by this PR.

  • Improvements & Bug fixes
    • HNSW segments should fork following reader/writer
    • Main logic change is making HNSW fork() write to a new file while loading from an old file - and make hnsw orchestrator respect it
    • Error handling improvements
  • New functionality
    • None

Test plan

How are these changes tested?

  • Tests pass locally with pytest for python, yarn test for js, cargo test for rust

Documentation Changes

None

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 3, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
chroma ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 6, 2024 10:06pm

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

@@ -44,3 +44,5 @@ pub(crate) enum ErrorCodes {
pub(crate) trait ChromaError: Error + Send {
fn code(&self) -> ErrorCodes;
}

impl Error for Box<dyn ChromaError> {}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

used to allow #[from] on Box

@HammadB HammadB merged commit f5c7651 into main May 6, 2024
46 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant