Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH] Support RI-4 and RI-5 hybrid read workloads. #3199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rescrv
Copy link
Contributor

@rescrv rescrv commented Nov 26, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

@rescrv rescrv force-pushed the rescrv/load2 branch 2 times, most recently from 0dc43b1 to 530ffb0 Compare December 2, 2024 20:48
Copy link
Contributor

@Sicheng-Pan Sicheng-Pan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@@ -36,5 +36,55 @@ pub fn all_workloads() -> HashMap<String, Workload> {
document: None,
}),
),
(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For later, but I am a little hesisitant about hard-coding the 30/70 part here. In general, I feel like workloads should be parameterized so that these values can be driven by runtime config.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The hard coded piece is the default pattern. You are free to shove json into the workload and make any pattern you wish.

Copy link
Contributor

@eculver eculver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am ok with getting this merged so that we can start iterating. My primary concern is in my previous comment but is non-blocking.

Base automatically changed from rescrv/load to main December 3, 2024 00:17
@rescrv rescrv merged commit 2a55b03 into main Dec 3, 2024
71 checks passed
@rescrv rescrv deleted the rescrv/load2 branch December 3, 2024 00:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants