-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chaikin Money Flow Strategy is added. #236
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the Indicator Go module, particularly focusing on the Chaikin Money Flow strategy. Key updates include a complete rewrite of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #236 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.83% 92.80% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 167 168 +1
Lines 4300 4353 +53
==========================================
+ Hits 3992 4040 +48
- Misses 249 253 +4
- Partials 59 60 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
strategy/volume/volume.go (1)
Line range hint
1-27
: Consider updating package documentationThe package documentation provides a good overview of the volume strategy functions. However, with the addition of the Chaikin Money Flow Strategy, it might be beneficial to update the package comment to mention this new strategy explicitly, especially if it's a significant addition to the package's functionality.
Consider adding a brief mention of the Chaikin Money Flow Strategy in the package comment, for example:
// Package volume contains the volume strategy functions. // // This package belongs to the Indicator project. Indicator is // a Golang module that supplies a variety of technical // indicators, strategies, and a backtesting framework // for analysis. +// +// Available strategies include: +// - Money Flow Index (MFI) +// - Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) // // # Licensestrategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy_test.go (3)
17-37
: LGTM: Well-structured test function with appropriate error handling.The
TestChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy
function is well-implemented, with good error handling and use of helper functions. It effectively tests the Chaikin Money Flow strategy by comparing computed results with expected outcomes.Consider adding a descriptive comment at the beginning of the function to explain its purpose and the strategy being tested. This would enhance the test's documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand the test's intent.
39-55
: LGTM: Well-implemented test for strategy report generation.The
TestChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyReport
function effectively tests the report generation capability of the Chaikin Money Flow strategy. It demonstrates good practices such as proper error handling and cleanup of test artifacts.Consider the following improvements:
- Add a check to verify the contents of the generated HTML file. This could involve reading the file back and asserting on its contents or structure.
- Use a temporary directory for the output file instead of the current directory. This can be achieved using
os.MkdirTemp()
.Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
func TestChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyReport(t *testing.T) { // ... (existing code) // Create a temporary directory for the test tempDir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "cmfs_test") if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } defer os.RemoveAll(tempDir) // Clean up fileName := filepath.Join(tempDir, "chaikin_money_flow_strategy.html") err = report.WriteToFile(fileName) if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } // Verify file contents content, err := os.ReadFile(fileName) if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } // Add assertions on the content if !strings.Contains(string(content), "Chaikin Money Flow Strategy") { t.Error("Report does not contain expected content") } }These changes would enhance the robustness of the test by verifying the output and ensuring clean test execution.
18-26
: Enhance test data documentation and error handling.While the use of CSV files for test data is commendable, there are opportunities to improve the documentation and robustness of the test data handling:
- Add comments describing the structure and purpose of the CSV files used in the tests.
- Consider implementing more specific error handling for different types of errors that might occur during file reading.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
// testdata/brk-b.csv contains historical price and volume data for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B) // Format: Date,Open,High,Low,Close,Volume snapshots, err := helper.ReadFromCsvFile[asset.Snapshot]("testdata/brk-b.csv", true) if err != nil { if os.IsNotExist(err) { t.Fatal("Test data file not found: testdata/brk-b.csv") } t.Fatalf("Failed to read test data: %v", err) } // testdata/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.csv contains expected strategy results // Format: Date,Action results, err := helper.ReadFromCsvFile[strategy.Result]("testdata/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.csv", true) if err != nil { if os.IsNotExist(err) { t.Fatal("Expected results file not found: testdata/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.csv") } t.Fatalf("Failed to read expected results: %v", err) }These changes would provide more context about the test data and improve error reporting.
strategy/volume/money_flow_index_strategy.go (1)
96-96
: Updated comment for accuracyThe comment has been correctly updated to reflect that closings[1] contains the "money flow index" instead of "superTrend". This change improves code clarity and prevents potential confusion.
Consider capitalizing "Money Flow Index" in the comment for consistency with the strategy name:
-// closings[1] -> money flow index +// closings[1] -> Money Flow Index
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
strategy/volume/testdata/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.csv
is excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- strategy/volume/README.md (2 hunks)
- strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.go (1 hunks)
- strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy_test.go (1 hunks)
- strategy/volume/money_flow_index_strategy.go (2 hunks)
- strategy/volume/volume.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
140-140: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
strategy/volume/volume.go (2)
26-30
: Overall change looks good, consider testing impactThe addition of the Chaikin Money Flow Strategy to the
AllStrategies()
function is a clean and straightforward change. It expands the functionality of the volume package as intended.To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, consider running the following verification:
This script will help identify any areas of the codebase that might need attention due to the addition of the new strategy. Please review the results and update any affected tests or code as necessary.
28-28
: New Chaikin Money Flow Strategy added successfully.The
NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy()
has been correctly added to theAllStrategies()
function, expanding the available volume strategies as intended.To ensure the new strategy is properly implemented and imported, let's run the following verification script:
This script will help us confirm that the new strategy is properly defined, imported, and structured within the project.
✅ Verification successful
New Chaikin Money Flow Strategy is properly implemented and imported.
- The
NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy()
function is defined.- The import statement for the strategy package is correctly included.
- The
ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy
struct is properly defined.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and import of the new Chaikin Money Flow Strategy # Test 1: Check if the NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function is defined echo "Checking for NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function definition:" rg --type go "func NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy\(\)" strategy/volume/ # Test 2: Verify the import statement for the strategy package echo "Verifying import statement for the strategy package:" rg --type go 'import \(.*"github.com/cinar/indicator/v2/strategy".*\)' strategy/volume/volume.go # Test 3: Look for the struct definition of ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy echo "Searching for ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy struct definition:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 1077
strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy_test.go (1)
1-15
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are well-structured and include all necessary dependencies for testing the Chaikin Money Flow strategy.
strategy/volume/money_flow_index_strategy.go (2)
57-57
: Improved formatting in Name() methodThe change to use "%.2f" instead of "%f" in the string formatting improves the precision and readability of the strategy name. This is a good enhancement that provides consistency in the output.
Line range hint
1-124
: Consider similar improvements in other filesThe changes made in this file improve formatting and clarity. It might be beneficial to review other strategy files to ensure consistent formatting of strategy names and accurate comments.
To check for potential inconsistencies in other strategy files, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Formatting and clarity improvements are consistent across strategy files. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential inconsistencies in strategy name formatting and comments # Test 1: Check for strategy name methods without %.2f formatting echo "Strategy name methods without %.2f formatting:" rg --type go 'func \(.*\) Name\(\) string.*return fmt\.Sprintf\(.*%[^2]f' strategy/ # Test 2: Check for comments mentioning 'superTrend' in strategy files echo "Comments mentioning 'superTrend' in strategy files:" rg --type go '//.*superTrend' strategy/Length of output: 439
strategy/volume/README.md (4)
67-76
: LGTM: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy type is well-documentedThe new
ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy
type is clearly defined and well-documented. The description provides a good overview of the strategy's behavior, which is helpful for users. The struct definition is properly commented, explaining the purpose of theChaikinMoneyFlow
field.
78-121
: LGTM: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy functions and methods are well-documentedThe new functions (
NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy
andNewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith
) and methods (Compute
,Name
, andReport
) for theChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy
are properly documented. The descriptions are clear and consistent with the documentation style of other strategies in the package. The parameters and return types are correctly specified, providing users with all necessary information.
29-34
: LGTM: README structure and consistency maintainedThe addition of the ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy to the README is well-integrated and consistent with the existing documentation. The index is properly updated to include the new strategy, and the overall structure of the README remains intact and well-organized. This ensures that users can easily find and understand the new strategy alongside the existing ones.
Line range hint
1-122
: Overall: Excellent documentation for ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyThe changes to the README file for the volume package are well-executed. The new ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy is thoroughly documented, following the established patterns and maintaining consistency with existing strategies. The additions include clear descriptions, proper function and method documentation, and updates to the index. This comprehensive documentation will greatly assist users in understanding and implementing the new strategy.
README.md (1)
140-140
: LGTM: Chaikin Money Flow Strategy added successfully.The addition of the Chaikin Money Flow Strategy to the list of Volume Strategies is consistent with the PR objectives. The link format follows the established pattern for other strategies in the README.
To ensure the link is correct and functional, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Chaikin Money Flow Strategy link verified successfully.
The Chaikin Money Flow Strategy has been correctly added to the list of Volume Strategies, and the link is functional. All checks pass as per the verification scripts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Chaikin Money Flow Strategy link # Test: Check if the linked file exists if [ -f "strategy/volume/README.md" ]; then echo "File exists. Checking for ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy section..." grep -q "type ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy" strategy/volume/README.md if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy section found in the file." else echo "WARNING: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy section not found in the file." fi else echo "WARNING: strategy/volume/README.md file not found." fiLength of output: 370
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
140-140: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
// Copyright (c) 2021-2024 Onur Cinar. | ||
// The source code is provided under GNU AGPLv3 License. | ||
// https://github.com/cinar/indicator | ||
|
||
package volume_test | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"os" | ||
"testing" | ||
|
||
"github.com/cinar/indicator/v2/asset" | ||
"github.com/cinar/indicator/v2/helper" | ||
"github.com/cinar/indicator/v2/strategy" | ||
"github.com/cinar/indicator/v2/strategy/volume" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func TestChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy(t *testing.T) { | ||
snapshots, err := helper.ReadFromCsvFile[asset.Snapshot]("testdata/brk-b.csv", true) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
t.Fatal(err) | ||
} | ||
|
||
results, err := helper.ReadFromCsvFile[strategy.Result]("testdata/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.csv", true) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
t.Fatal(err) | ||
} | ||
|
||
expected := helper.Map(results, func(r *strategy.Result) strategy.Action { return r.Action }) | ||
|
||
cmfs := volume.NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy() | ||
actual := cmfs.Compute(snapshots) | ||
|
||
err = helper.CheckEquals(actual, expected) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
t.Fatal(err) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyReport(t *testing.T) { | ||
snapshots, err := helper.ReadFromCsvFile[asset.Snapshot]("testdata/brk-b.csv", true) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
t.Fatal(err) | ||
} | ||
|
||
cmfs := volume.NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy() | ||
report := cmfs.Report(snapshots) | ||
|
||
fileName := "chaikin_money_flow_strategy.html" | ||
defer os.Remove(fileName) | ||
|
||
err = report.WriteToFile(fileName) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
t.Fatal(err) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding more test cases for improved coverage.
The current test file provides good coverage of the main functionalities of the Chaikin Money Flow strategy. However, to enhance the robustness of the tests, consider adding the following:
- Edge case tests (e.g., empty data set, single data point).
- Error scenario tests (e.g., malformed input data).
- Tests with different parameter values for the strategy.
Here's an example of how you might implement an edge case test:
func TestChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyEdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
cmfs := volume.NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy()
t.Run("EmptyDataSet", func(t *testing.T) {
result := cmfs.Compute([]asset.Snapshot{})
if len(result) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected empty result for empty input, got %v", result)
}
})
t.Run("SingleDataPoint", func(t *testing.T) {
snapshot := asset.Snapshot{/* initialize with test data */}
result := cmfs.Compute([]asset.Snapshot{snapshot})
// Add assertions based on expected behavior for a single data point
})
}
Adding these tests would increase confidence in the strategy's behavior across various scenarios.
// NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Money Flow Index strategy instance with the | ||
// default parameters. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update function documentation to refer to the correct strategy
The comments for NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy
and NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith
incorrectly refer to initializing a "Money Flow Index strategy" instead of the "Chaikin Money Flow Strategy".
Apply this diff to correct the comments:
-// NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Money Flow Index strategy instance with the
+// NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Money Flow strategy instance with the
// default parameters.
-// NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith function initializes a new Money Flow Index strategy instance with the
+// NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith function initializes a new Chaikin Money Flow strategy instance with the
// given parameters.
Also applies to: 31-32
// Recommends a Sell action when it crosses above 0, and recommends a Buy action when it crosses below 0. | ||
type ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy struct { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incorrect description of the strategy's Buy and Sell signals
The comments describe the strategy as recommending a Sell action when the Chaikin Money Flow crosses above 0 and a Buy action when it crosses below 0. However, traditionally, when the Chaikin Money Flow crosses above 0, it indicates buying pressure, suggesting a Buy signal. Conversely, crossing below 0 indicates selling pressure, suggesting a Sell signal.
Apply this diff to correct the description:
-// Recommends a Sell action when it crosses above 0, and recommends a Buy action when it crosses below 0.
+// Recommends a Buy action when it crosses above 0, and recommends a Sell action when it crosses below 0.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
// Recommends a Sell action when it crosses above 0, and recommends a Buy action when it crosses below 0. | |
type ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy struct { | |
// Recommends a Buy action when it crosses above 0, and recommends a Sell action when it crosses below 0. | |
type ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy struct { |
actions := helper.Map(cmfs, func(cmf float64) strategy.Action { | ||
if cmf < 0 { | ||
return strategy.Buy | ||
} | ||
|
||
if cmf > 0 { | ||
return strategy.Sell | ||
} | ||
|
||
return strategy.Hold | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reverse the logic in action mapping to align with standard CMF interpretation
In the Compute
method, the current logic assigns a Buy action when cmf < 0
and a Sell action when cmf > 0
. This is the opposite of the standard interpretation of the Chaikin Money Flow indicator. Typically, a positive CMF indicates buying pressure, suggesting a Buy signal, and a negative CMF indicates selling pressure, suggesting a Sell signal.
Apply this diff to correct the logic:
actions := helper.Map(cmfs, func(cmf float64) strategy.Action {
- if cmf < 0 {
+ if cmf > 0 {
return strategy.Buy
}
- if cmf > 0 {
+ if cmf < 0 {
return strategy.Sell
}
return strategy.Hold
})
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
actions := helper.Map(cmfs, func(cmf float64) strategy.Action { | |
if cmf < 0 { | |
return strategy.Buy | |
} | |
if cmf > 0 { | |
return strategy.Sell | |
} | |
return strategy.Hold | |
}) | |
actions := helper.Map(cmfs, func(cmf float64) strategy.Action { | |
if cmf > 0 { | |
return strategy.Buy | |
} | |
if cmf < 0 { | |
return strategy.Sell | |
} | |
return strategy.Hold | |
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
strategy/volume/README.md (3)
66-76
: LGTM: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy type definitionThe ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy type is well-defined and documented. The description clearly explains its purpose and behavior.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what the Chaikin Money Flow indicator represents, as it might not be familiar to all readers. For example:
ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy represents the configuration parameters for calculating the Chaikin Money Flow strategy. Recommends a Buy action when it crosses above 0, and recommends a Sell action when it crosses below 0. +The Chaikin Money Flow indicator measures the buying and selling pressure of an asset over a specific period.
78-86
: LGTM: NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function documentationThe NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function is well-documented, clearly stating its purpose and return type.
There's a minor grammatical issue in the description. Consider adding the missing article "a":
-NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Money Flow strategy instance with the default parameters. +NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Money Flow strategy instance with the default parameters.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...rategy() *ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy ``` NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Mone...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
96-122
: LGTM: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy methods documentationThe Compute, Name, and Report methods of ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy are well-documented with clear and concise descriptions. The documentation style is consistent with other parts of the README.
For consistency with other method descriptions in the README, consider adding "function" after the method names in the comments. For example:
-Compute processes the provided asset snapshots and generates a stream of actionable recommendations. +Compute function processes the provided asset snapshots and generates a stream of actionable recommendations. -Name returns the name of the strategy. +Name function returns the name of the strategy. -Report processes the provided asset snapshots and generates a report annotated with the recommended actions. +Report function processes the provided asset snapshots and generates a report annotated with the recommended actions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
strategy/volume/testdata/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.csv
is excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- strategy/volume/README.md (2 hunks)
- strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
strategy/volume/README.md
[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...rategy() *ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy ``` NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Mone...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
strategy/volume/README.md (3)
29-34
: LGTM: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy added to indexThe ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy and its methods have been correctly added to the index. The formatting and linking are consistent with the existing entries.
87-95
: LGTM: NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith function documentationThe NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith function is well-documented, clearly stating its purpose, parameter, and return type. The documentation style is consistent with other functions in the README.
Line range hint
1-122
: Overall assessment: Well-documented addition of ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyThe changes to the README.md file effectively introduce and document the new ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy. The additions are well-integrated into the existing structure, maintaining consistency in style and format. The documentation provides clear explanations of the strategy's purpose, its methods, and how to use it.
A few minor suggestions have been made to further improve clarity and consistency, but these are not critical issues. Great job on maintaining the documentation quality!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...rategy() *ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy ``` NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Mone...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
strategy/volume/README.md (1)
78-85
: Improve readability with minor grammatical adjustmentThe function description is clear, but it can be improved by adding the article "the" before "default parameters". Consider updating the sentence to:
- NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Money Flow strategy instance with default parameters. + NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Money Flow strategy instance with the default parameters.This small change enhances readability and addresses the grammatical suggestion.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...rategy() *ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy ``` NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Mone...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- strategy/volume/README.md (2 hunks)
- strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- strategy/volume/chaikin_money_flow_strategy.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
strategy/volume/README.md
[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...rategy() *ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy ``` NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Mone...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
strategy/volume/README.md (5)
29-34
: LGTM: Index updated correctlyThe index has been properly updated to include the new ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy and its associated methods. The formatting and structure are consistent with the existing entries, making it easy for users to navigate the documentation.
66-76
: LGTM: ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy type well-definedThe ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy type is well-defined with a clear description of its purpose and recommendation logic. The struct definition is appropriately simple, containing only the necessary Chaikin Money Flow indicator field.
87-94
: LGTM: NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith function well-documentedThe documentation for the NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategyWith function is clear and concise. It correctly indicates that the function allows customization of the strategy by specifying a period parameter.
96-121
: LGTM: Method documentation is clear and consistentThe documentation for the Compute, Name, and Report methods is clear, concise, and consistent with the documentation style used throughout the package. Each method's purpose is well-described, providing users with sufficient information to understand their functionality.
Line range hint
1-122
: Overall: Excellent addition to the volume package documentationThe changes to the README.md file for the volume package are well-structured and informative. The addition of the ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy documentation enhances the overall content, providing users with clear information about the new strategy and its methods. The consistency in style and structure with existing documentation maintains the high quality of the package's documentation.
A minor grammatical improvement was suggested for the NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function description, but this is a small detail in an otherwise excellent update.
Great job on maintaining comprehensive and user-friendly documentation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...rategy() *ChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy ``` NewChaikinMoneyFlowStrategy function initializes a new Chaikin Mone...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
Describe Request
Chaikin Money Flow Strategy is added.
Change Type
New strategy.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests