Skip to content

Conversation

@PikaZ76
Copy link

@PikaZ76 PikaZ76 commented Nov 19, 2025

What changed? Why?

fix ZSTD compression in replicator

How did you test the change?

  • unit test
  • integration test
  • functional test
  • adhoc test (described below)

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @PikaZ76, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses and rectifies issues related to data compression within the replicator component. It introduces a more flexible and robust mechanism for handling various compression types, with a specific focus on ensuring proper processing of ZSTD compressed data. The changes streamline the data flow by correctly decompressing incoming data and recompressing it to the required format.

Highlights

  • Refactored Compression Logic: The pull request refactors the data compression and decompression logic within the replicator, moving from a switch statement based on blockFile.Compression to a more generalized approach that handles different source and target compression types.
  • ZSTD Compression Support: Explicitly adds support for ZSTD compression in the replicator's data processing, ensuring that ZSTD compressed block data is correctly handled and assigned.
  • Improved Robustness: The new logic ensures that block data is correctly decompressed from its source format and then recompressed to the desired target format, improving the overall robustness of the compression pipeline.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to add support for ZSTD compression in the replicator. The changes correctly add ZSTD to the supported compression types and refactor the compression handling logic. However, the new logic for converting between compression formats has a potential issue where it might call compression/decompression utilities with api.Compression_NONE, which could lead to runtime errors. I've provided a suggestion to make this logic more robust by adding explicit checks. The rest of the changes look good.

@PikaZ76 PikaZ76 merged commit 3adfaec into master Nov 20, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants