Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EVER-14024 : Form : Implemented form/input HTML5 ValidityState valida… #321

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wendigolabs
Copy link
Contributor

…tion, integrated with custom validation.

Working draft, needs better tests, examples, PR summary.

@wendigolabs wendigolabs requested a review from pixelbandito June 29, 2021 22:27
@wendigolabs
Copy link
Contributor Author

I re-forked this since the changes are pretty big and we probably want to start the commentary over.

</Form>
);

describe('<Form />', () => {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need something like it('handles native events', ....

'tooShort',
'typeMismatch',
'valueMissing',
];
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Meh. Brittle.

@wendigolabs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Much of the discussion, and advise by @pixelbandito in mikemfleming:FORM-292 is still relevant and needs to be addressed after we've gone over the larger issues related to the ValidityState respamulation in this PR.

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
# \<Form\>

Add your documentation for the `Form` component here.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Flesh ValidityState out, then get busy.

@wendigolabs wendigolabs added the new feature Will require a minor version bump label Jun 30, 2021
@pixelbandito
Copy link
Contributor

Finally got around to reading the validity state docs, looks good!

@pixelbandito
Copy link
Contributor

This is looking really good. I know there's some stuff left to do, at least around documentation, but if you want to rebase on master / merge master in, and push this so we can all play with it, I'm ok with that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new feature Will require a minor version bump
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants