You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently comments are stripped out of the CSL file on import since this makes it easier to match the XML node numbering used in citeproc's reverse mapping support.
These comments should be retained.
It appears especially disrespectful now that we add our own "This style was edited with..." comment to output files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FWIW, in my own script to standardize the ordering of elements in the cs:info section I do the following: I keep comments (plural) at the top and any comment (singular) at the bottom of the cs:info section at their respective positions. Other comments are kept with the preceding XML element.
Currently comments are stripped out of the CSL file on import since this makes it easier to match the XML node numbering used in citeproc's reverse mapping support.
These comments should be retained.
It appears especially disrespectful now that we add our own "This style was edited with..." comment to output files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: