-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check before logicalrep for rebalancer, error if needed #6754
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1c35c5e
Check before logicalrep for rebalancer, error if needed
agedemenli 92779b9
Check before logicalrep for background rebalancer, error if needed
agedemenli dd41d6e
Move EnsureReferenceTablesExistOnAllNodesExtended to somewhere after …
agedemenli 3457f89
Copy ref tables in case there's no table to rebalance
agedemenli 3bda153
Merge branch 'main' into check-beforehand-if-logicalrep
agedemenli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check should be done even before planning the moves and before calling
EnsureReferenceTablesExistOnAllNodesExtended
. We do this already for the background rebalancer:citus/src/backend/distributed/operations/shard_rebalancer.c
Lines 1905 to 1917 in e3cf7ac
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think what we actually want to check is the move list itself. Otherwise we would be throwing the logical replication error even for the balanced tables (if they don't have a replica identity or primary key), but we actually were not going to move their shards. If we move the check to somewhere before planning the moves, then we might even throw that error instead of "no moves available" notice message. I think we should do the same for the background rebalancer. We should call
VerifyTablesHaveReplicaIdentity
for each element inplacementUpdateList
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does seem useful to indicate to users that their future rebalances will fail by throwing the error even when there are no moves, because otherwise they will find out when they actually do need to rebalance. I don't feel strongly about this though.