Improve styling of address block on summary screen

[colemanw]

Overview

More consistent styling of the address block with other elements of the contact summary screen; makes the block easier to see when the contact does not have an address.

Before

After

Before (w Shoreditch)

After (w Shoreditch)

[civibot]

(Standard links)

• If this is your first pull-request for CiviCRM, please browse CONTRIBUTING.md for information about the development and testing processes.
• If you are reviewing this pull-request, you may wish to consult the test sites and the Review Standards (long template, short template).

[colemanw]

@tschuettler I'm on a contact summary improvement kick right now!
BTW have you seen the new Layout Editor extension?

[tschuettler]

@colemanw I agree that it does make more sense to display the label all the time.

It currently does not work for multiple addresses.
I'm not sure whether multiple addresses should stay more compact by spanning over both columns or using the same design as the other elements like E-Mail or Phone.

This contact has actually 4 addresses:

[tschuettler]

This also hides all other other adresses and just leaves the primary one.

[tschuettler]

The extension looks like a really nice feature! We currently get along with ACL-based display of custom field sets reasonably well.

[colemanw]

@tschuettler whoops, that was a mistake. Now fixed.

[eileenmcnaughton]

test this please

[tschuettler]

I can confirm that it works again:

It seems like #12708 introduced the odd spacing between multiple addresses in 8fa8736#diff-6e4b278c9fc95f56b5040a44db65e310R25

Do we need that there or can we add something with more specificty to counter it?

.crm-address-block {
    clear: none;
}

This would look better to me:

[colemanw]

Thanks @tschuettler - you're right that clear:both was causing problems. I've removed it as it wasn't really essential to the previous PR; I had added it "just in case" but if it's causing problems, let's get rid of it.

[tschuettler]

Thanks @colemanw - it's looking good now.

[colemanw]

@civicrm-builder retest this please