pypi/pypi/-/matplotlib/3.4.1

[clearlydefinedbot]

Type: Auto

Summary:
pypi/pypi/-/matplotlib/3.4.1

Details:
Add OTHER license

Resolution:
Auto-generated curation. Newly harvested version 3.4.1 matches existing version 3.3.4.
Matching metadata: registryData.info.license: 'PSF'

Affected definitions:

• matplotlib 3.4.1

[clearlydefinedbot]

You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined.

[AE49]

@capfei This could be Declared as PSF-2.0. PyPI metadata is PSF. The license is a close enough match with references to PSF and Python customized, but main licensing text was not changed. https://matplotlib.org/stable/users/license.html. Thoughts?

[AE49]

Same as #10486. Changing to PSF-2.0

[saheel1115]

@AE49 Thanks a lot for taking this up!

After your changes, looks like the ClearlyDefined curation check was unsuccessful. How can we resolve that and complete the pull request?

--
Saheel (dev at microsoft)

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved.

[capfei]

@saheel1115 Validation is still failing for PSF-2.0 due to an issue with the bot. Will merge when resolved. Tracking in #11048.

[saheel1115]

@capfei Thanks for the update! I'll pass it forward to others in my team.

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved.