-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
python 3.7.5 #9023
python 3.7.5 #9023
Conversation
You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined. |
Leaning toward PSF 2.0, but curious to hear if you agree @ariel11. There is a difference between Python 2.0 and PSF 2.0. The language in the license files mentioned above shows a differing license schedule for various versions, this specific package falling in the latest license indication. |
@AE49 I would curate as Python-2.0 since this is the Python license for Python 3.7. @ariel11 Thoughts? |
@TRQ3 - I am unclear on this one given the changes made to the license file. Let's discuss with broader community. Thanks |
Checking with SPDX: spdx/license-list-XML#1200 |
@capfei / @royaljust - The below shows a portion of a comparison between the actual Python project license file and the SPDX "Python-2.0." Given the differences, I think our guidelines (and the SPDX matching guidelines) would indicate we should curate this as "OTHER." Do you agree? If a SPDX identifier is later created for the actual Python project license, we could submit a PR to update these. |
Conflicts have been resolved. |
Type: Missing
Summary:
python 3.7.5
Details:
Add PSF-2.0 License
Resolution:
License Url:
https://docs.python.org/3.7/license.html
Description:
Reading the license URL it seems to be the only choice which fits?
Pull request generated by Microsoft tooling.
Affected definitions: