-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
final changes for v0.5 #89
Conversation
dtebbs
commented
Nov 3, 2021
•
edited by AntoineRondelet
Loading
edited by AntoineRondelet
- removed redundant return
- updated zeth submodule to latest
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void load_keypair( | |||
keypair_file.c_str(), std::ios_base::in | std::ios_base::binary); | |||
in.exceptions( | |||
std::ios_base::eofbit | std::ios_base::badbit | std::ios_base::failbit); | |||
return wsnark::keypair_read_bytes(keypair, in); | |||
wsnark::keypair_read_bytes(keypair, in); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, this return isn't needed.
We could stick to the approach used in Zeth though and change the returned type to a snark:keypair
and declare the keypair in the function. However, we would have some copy of the keypair when return.
TL;DR is: this change looks good to me but we have some slight inconsistency between similar functions in Zeth and Zecale, so that would be valuable to clear that out (and probably move these functions in a namespace like libzeth::server
that could then be used on zecale as libzeth::server::load_keypair
)
(see: https://github.com/clearmatics/zeth/blob/develop/prover_server/prover_server.cpp#L44-L54 for ref)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not strictly a blocker for the release, but better code factorization will mean, less code to maintain and less inconsistencies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, outstanding comment on code factorization across Zeth and Zecale moved in issue clearmatics/zeth#417