Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

final changes for v0.5 #89

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2021
Merged

final changes for v0.5 #89

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2021

Conversation

dtebbs
Copy link
Contributor

@dtebbs dtebbs commented Nov 3, 2021

  • removed redundant return
  • updated zeth submodule to latest

@dtebbs dtebbs mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2021
4 tasks
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void load_keypair(
keypair_file.c_str(), std::ios_base::in | std::ios_base::binary);
in.exceptions(
std::ios_base::eofbit | std::ios_base::badbit | std::ios_base::failbit);
return wsnark::keypair_read_bytes(keypair, in);
wsnark::keypair_read_bytes(keypair, in);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, this return isn't needed.
We could stick to the approach used in Zeth though and change the returned type to a snark:keypair and declare the keypair in the function. However, we would have some copy of the keypair when return.
TL;DR is: this change looks good to me but we have some slight inconsistency between similar functions in Zeth and Zecale, so that would be valuable to clear that out (and probably move these functions in a namespace like libzeth::server that could then be used on zecale as libzeth::server::load_keypair)

(see: https://github.com/clearmatics/zeth/blob/develop/prover_server/prover_server.cpp#L44-L54 for ref)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not strictly a blocker for the release, but better code factorization will mean, less code to maintain and less inconsistencies.

Copy link
Contributor

@AntoineRondelet AntoineRondelet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, outstanding comment on code factorization across Zeth and Zecale moved in issue clearmatics/zeth#417

@AntoineRondelet AntoineRondelet merged commit c5a16fd into develop Nov 4, 2021
@AntoineRondelet AntoineRondelet deleted the v0.5-final-fixes branch November 4, 2021 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants