Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(query): Make current plan type hashable #782

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

joshua-spacetime
Copy link
Collaborator

A prerequisite for #747.

Description of Changes

Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on here.

API and ABI breaking changes

If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label.

Expected complexity level and risk

How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1 to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning ways.

@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime force-pushed the joshua/feat/hash-query-plan branch 3 times, most recently from 2ad6a60 to 234fc7c Compare February 1, 2024 19:44
@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime force-pushed the joshua/feat/hash-query-plan branch from 234fc7c to e4f1d23 Compare February 1, 2024 20:15
Copy link
Contributor

@mamcx mamcx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit befe8b7 Feb 2, 2024
5 checks passed
@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime deleted the joshua/feat/hash-query-plan branch February 2, 2024 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants