Skip to content

Conversation

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaxGekk MaxGekk commented May 20, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Regenerated the following benchmarks on JDK 8 and 11:

  • DateTimeBenchmark
  • CSVBenchmark
  • JsonBenchmark

How was this patch tested?

By running the benchmark in the environment:

Item Description
Region us-west-2 (Oregon)
Instance r3.xlarge
AMI ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5)
Java OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Owner

can you rebase this PR?

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

MaxGekk commented May 21, 2020

@cloud-fan Do you want to just rebase or re-run the bechmarks?

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Owner

seems just re-run the benchmark is easier.

@MaxGekk MaxGekk closed this May 29, 2020
@MaxGekk MaxGekk deleted the cloud-fan-missing-year-hour-2 branch June 5, 2020 19:49
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Pin `pandas==2.0.3` for `pypy3.8`

### Why are the changes needed?
Pandas 2.1+/2.2+ requires [Python 3.9+](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/2.1/getting_started/install.html), the latest version works for Python 3.8 is `pandas==2.0.3`.
Installation with `pandas>=2.2.2` fails with:
```
#17 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c pypy3 -m pip install numpy 'six==1.16.0' 'pandas>=2.2.2' scipy coverage matplotlib lxml" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1
------
 > [11/31] RUN pypy3 -m pip install numpy 'six==1.16.0' 'pandas>=2.2.2' scipy coverage matplotlib lxml:
1.454 Collecting numpy
1.491   Downloading numpy-1.24.4-pp38-pypy38_pp73-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl.metadata (5.6 kB)
1.537 Collecting six==1.16.0
1.549   Downloading six-1.16.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl.metadata (1.8 kB)
1.691 ERROR: Ignored the following versions that require a different python version: 1.25.0 Requires-Python >=3.9; 1.25.0rc1 Requires-Python >=3.9; 1.25.1 Requires-Python >=3.9; 1.25.2 Requires-Python >=3.9; 1.26.0 Requires-Python <3.13,>=3.9; 1.26.0b1 Requires-Python <3.13,>=3.9; 1.26.0rc1 Requires-Python <3.13,>=3.9; 1.26.1 Requires-Python <3.13,>=3.9; 1.26.2 Requires-Python >=3.9; 1.26.3 Requires-Python >=3.9; 1.26.4 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.0.0b1 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.0.0rc1 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.1.0 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.1.0rc0 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.1.1 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.1.2 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.1.3 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.1.4 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.2.0 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.2.0rc0 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.2.1 Requires-Python >=3.9; 2.2.2 Requires-Python >=3.9
1.693 ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement pandas>=2.2.2 (from versions: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3.0, 0.4.0, 0.4.1, 0.4.2, 0.4.3, 0.5.0, 0.6.0, 0.6.1, 0.7.0, 0.7.1, 0.7.2, 0.7.3, 0.8.0, 0.8.1, 0.9.0, 0.9.1, 0.10.0, 0.10.1, 0.11.0, 0.12.0, 0.13.0, 0.13.1, 0.14.0, 0.14.1, 0.15.0, 0.15.1, 0.15.2, 0.16.0, 0.16.1, 0.16.2, 0.17.0, 0.17.1, 0.18.0, 0.18.1, 0.19.0, 0.19.1, 0.19.2, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0, 0.23.1, 0.23.2, 0.23.3, 0.23.4, 0.24.0, 0.24.1, 0.24.2, 0.25.0, 0.25.1, 0.25.2, 0.25.3, 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4, 1.0.5, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5, 1.3.0, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.0rc0, 1.4.0, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.5.0rc0, 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, 2.0.0rc0, 2.0.0rc1, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3)
1.694 ERROR: No matching distribution found for pandas>=2.2.2
```

`pandas<=2.2.2` is pretty misleading, as if pandas 2.2.2 is supported.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no, infra-only

### How was this patch tested?
ci

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
no

Closes apache#46159 from zhengruifeng/py_38_pandas.

Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants