Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorganize dapf #695

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Reorganize dapf #695

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

mendess
Copy link
Collaborator

@mendess mendess commented Oct 15, 2024

  • Separate out human friendly parsers of DAP types to seperate module
  • Cleanup TestAction::CreateAddTaskJson
  • create dap functions module
  • Move to functions::helper the code needed to make a request to the helper
    which will allow us to possibly reuse this code in a individual dapf function

Copy link
Contributor

@cjpatton cjpatton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nits only. Note one of the commit titles is so long that GitHub splits it out into the commit body. I think it's a good idea to make the title fit on one line so that git log is easier to read.

crates/dapf/src/cli_parsers.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/dapf/src/cli_parsers.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/dapf/src/cli_parsers.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/dapf/src/functions/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/dapf/src/functions/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/dapf/src/acceptance/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…lper

This will allow us to possibly reuse this code in a individual dapf function
@mendess mendess merged commit 2b5e141 into main Oct 17, 2024
3 checks passed
@mendess mendess deleted the mendess/organize-dapf branch October 17, 2024 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants