Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/wit bindgen file check #6

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

PI-Victor
Copy link
Member

@PI-Victor PI-Victor commented Jul 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced validation process for WIT API in CI workflow.
    • Updated module import paths and refactored configuration deserialization in Hetzner plugin.

PI-Victor added 3 commits July 8, 2024 10:56
Move the bindgen from a relative path to a symlink.

Signed-off-by: Victor Palade <victor@cloudflavor.io>
Signed-off-by: Victor Palade <victor@cloudflavor.io>
To work around the mandatory --with which seems to be an oversight,
a script will parse the error output and ignore it if it's related
to unused remappings.

Signed-off-by: Victor Palade <victor@cloudflavor.io>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes update a GitHub Actions workflow to use a custom script for checking WIT APIs, modify a module import path and refactor the deserialize_config function in the Hetzner plugin, and introduce a new script and file for WIT validation. These enhancements streamline WIT API validation and refine the Hetzner plugin's codebase.

Changes

Files Change Summaries
.github/workflows/rust.yml Enable the "Check WIT API" step using check-wit.sh.
plugins/hetzner/src/lib.rs Adjust module import path and refine deserialize_config.
plugins/hetzner/wit New file added, referencing ../../spec/wit.
scripts/check-wit.sh New script for validating WIT files using wit-bindgen.

Poem

In the realm of code so neat,
Scripts and modules took their seat.
With paths refined and checks made new,
The Hetzner plugin grew and grew.
From check-wit.sh, a tale is told,
Of validation strong and bold.
🎉✨ Code now shines like magic gold! ✨🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c48739 and 72696a0.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/rust.yml (1 hunks)
  • plugins/hetzner/src/lib.rs (2 hunks)
  • plugins/hetzner/wit (1 hunks)
  • scripts/check-wit.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • plugins/hetzner/src/lib.rs
  • scripts/check-wit.sh
Additional comments not posted (2)
plugins/hetzner/wit (1)

1-1: Path reference looks good.

The path ../../spec/wit seems correct based on the provided context.

.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)

28-29: New workflow step looks good.

The addition of the step to run scripts/check-wit.sh is correctly integrated into the workflow.

@PI-Victor
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@oscar-automaton
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping merge due to missing "approved" label

@PI-Victor
Copy link
Member Author

/approve
/merge

@oscar-automaton
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping merge due to missing "approved" label

@PI-Victor
Copy link
Member Author

/merge force

@oscar-automaton
Copy link
Contributor

Force merging pull request

@oscar-automaton oscar-automaton bot merged commit 3594a89 into main Jul 8, 2024
1 check passed
@PI-Victor PI-Victor deleted the fix/wit-bindgen-file-check branch July 8, 2024 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant